King George V addresses sailors of the BGF from the deck of the crippled battleship Warspite after the battle. |
We
have seen how the German return to home 24hours ahead of the British enabled
them to steal a march with their version of events, which quite clearly
trumpeted a striking German victory against the British Grand Fleet. This news
reached the British government and population before the Admiralty's own
official version of events and led to surprise, incomprehension and anger.
From the beginning the knives were out for Jellicoe, setting the scene for
later bitter disputes. In the short term however a gradual appreciation of the facts
beyond the simple totals of ships and men lost brought a reappraisal. In mid
June, an American newspaper summarised this with a neat analogy: "The
German Fleet has assaulted its jailor, but it is still in jail."
Jellicoe and the
Admiralty fumed at the way the German interpretations warped the public
perception of their actions. In June, Jellicoe wrote to his wife:
Of course I am not
satisfied, as given clear weather the battle would have been final and there
would have been no German Fleet left, whatever happened to us. But that can't
be helped. It is ludicrous for the Germans to claim a victory. Victory always
rests with the force that occupies the scene of the action, and we did this for
the greater part of the next day, until it was quite clear that they had all
gone home or as many as were left to go. If they had been so confident of
victory they would have tried to go on fighting instead of legging it for home.
The German High Command
knew it. In his confidential report on the Battle to the Kaiser in July 1916,
Scheer admitted:
Should future operations take a favourable course, we should be able to inflict serious damage upon the enemy. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that even the most successful outcome of a further battle will not force England to make peace.... A victorious end to the war within a reasonable time can only be achieved through the defeat of the British economic life - that is, by using the U-boats against British trade.... It is my duty to advise Your Majesty that in British waters, where American interests are strong, it will be impossible to avoid incidents, however conscientious our commanding officers may be.... "
The passage of time,
through the rest of the war and the early post-war years consolidated the view
that Scheer, in a fog of uncertainty had ridden his luck and made decisions
that allowed his fleet to escape, rather than being the tactical genius
portrayed in the German and wider press. His U-boat and aerial reconnaissance plans had
made zero contribution to the battle, and in good visibility his fleet might have been annihilated by the BGF.
The summary naval verdict was best summarised sixty years later by
Marder:
(From
the Dreadnought to Scapa Flow [1978]) with his judgement that:
"since neither fleet was able to
inflict a crippling blow on the other, the battle belongs to the series of
inconclusive battles or partial victories which are the rule in naval
warfare."
Admiral David Beatty - unaccountably promoted C-in-C after his performance at Jutland |
In Britain however,
matters became inflamed post-war with arguments for and against the reputations
of Beatty and Jellicoe. Notwithstanding his error strewn performance at
Jutland, Beatty was promoted to Commander in Chief of the BGF in late 1916, as
Jellicoe stood down on health grounds. In this role Beatty received the
surrender of the German Fleet at the war end in 1918, and rapidly became a national hero. After the war a report of the battle was
prepared by the Admiralty under First Sea Lord Wemyss, by Sir Julian Corbett and Vice Admiral
John Harper. Before the report was published, Beatty
was himself appointed First Sea Lord, and immediately requested amendments to
the report. (Now) Viscount Jellicoe, posted overseas as Governor General of New
Zealand, was forced to defend his position from the other side of the world. When
the authors refused to comply with Beatty’s demands, he ordered the report to be
destroyed and instead had an alternative report prepared, which proved highly
critical of Jellicoe. Considerable argument broke out as a result, with
significant numbers of servicemen disputing the published version, including
Admiral Reginald Bacon – a brilliant, if opinionated officer - who wrote his own book about the battle,
criticising both the version sponsored by Beatty and Beatty's own part in the
battle. It contains this withering view of Beatty:
Admiral Beatty…failed when an experienced
admiral would have succeeded, and his battle cruisers paid dearly for the
omission, and the nation missed what should have been an annihilating victory”
However, Beatty remained
the dashing Nelsonian hero of the popular press (and hence the man in the
street) for many years. Have we got the perspective right now? It seems to me
that Beatty was a reckless and vainglorious commander, intolerant of others and
quick to apportion blame. Jellicoe’s more measured approach ensured continuing
British control of the oceans, making a major contribution to eventual victory
– am I wrong?
Never again would such
battle fleets assemble on the high seas. The arrival of air power, better
submarines, missiles and above all better communications meant that an event
such as Jutland could never be repeated.
Regarding the
remainder of WW1, the Jutland outcome had a major impact on German conduct of
the war. The British distant blockade of trade bound for Germany continued, and
increasing levels of famine began to affect front line soldiers as well as the home
population. The dreadful ‘turnip winter’ of 1917-18 brought the civilian
population to its knees.
SMS Seydlitz - crippled at Jutland. Such damage influenced the Germans against trying a repeat operation. |
Scheer’s report was
backed by the military, but resisted by the politicians led by Bethmann-Hollweg, the chancellor, until early 1917, when unrestricted U boat warfare was finally
resumed, rapidly bringing the USA into the war.
Finally, the morale of
the men of the GHSF was destroyed by the outcome of Jutland – cooped up in home
ports and the Baltic Sea with no prospect of real action. In late 1918 those men
mutinied against orders for a final suicide sortie into the North Sea.
Here was the real
outcome of the Battle of Jutland, and Jellicoe’s prudent tactics.
No comments:
Post a Comment